.
In your answer you must:
- analyse the ways in which media language has been used in combination in sources A and B to convey values, attitudes and beliefs about the world
- refer to relevant contexts and academic ideas and arguments in your analysis and draw judgements and conclusions in relation to the question.
-
3 Steps:
1. Deconstruct media language of the text
2. Representations within the main story
3. How does all of this link to the papers ideology (attitudes and beliefs)?
-
-
-
Both sources convey attitudes and beliefs about Brexit. Britain joined the EU in 1973 in order to boost the countries economic and trade status. By 2016 there was a referendum in order to decide whether Britain was to stay in the EU, which concluded in a vote of 52% leave, and 48% stay. This shows that it was only a 4% difference which has divided Britain in different views which can be reflected through the media. Source A, Daily Mail, is a newspaper which displays right-wing views for leaving the EU. Whereas Source B, is a newspaper that is displaying left-wing views on remaining in the EU.
.
In Source A, The attitude towards Brexit and Theresa May on the whole is more right-winged views which is more of a positive look on Brexit and is furthermore supporting it. This can be seen through the headline 'hands off our election'. The way this has been worded is much more calmer and not violent. This puts Theresa May in a good light and the use of the word 'our' shows that she is speaking with and for the people, not being selfish. The fact that it is in large, bold, capitalised letters proves that it is a strong view and it is an important topic to Britain as a whole which strengthens the fact that they want independence and Theresa May is the person doing that for us. The headline is also in the form of a quote in which she has said which makes it more personal and can appeal to the demographic and target audience and make them feel more included and they know what they are reading is from a trusted source. In the speech the text refers to her as 'Mrs May' which comes across as more formal showing that she has more respect.
-
Whereas in Source B, The attitude towards Brexit and Theresa May on the whole is more left-winged views and portrays Theresa May in a much harsher and mean way, showing that the guardian newspaper is not supporting Brexit and has a majority remaining view. This can be seen through the headline of 'May declares war on Brussels'. This is a heavy contrast between source A because it shows her as a violent leader and more in a selfish way. The word 'war' has very heavy violent connotations and further suggests that Theresa May is not doing the right thing by supporting Brexit because wars are very negative things that should definitely not be happening, initiating that this is the same with Brexit and it is unnecessary as is war. The headline also refers to Theresa May as just 'May' which could further suggest that they are not taking her seriously as calling someone only by there surname is a very informal way to refer to, especially as a Prime Minister. This further supports that as a newspaper they are not taking Brexit serious and believe it is not important and shouldn't be happening. This is very unlikely and surprising coming from the guardian newspaper as usually they are very formal. The verb 'declares' also shows that Theresa May is not being a very good leader as she is declaring it for herself and not doing what is best for the country, as declaring it for herself can be seen as quite selfish.
-
Another way to prove that the attitude in source A towards Brexit and Theresa May is positive is when you look at the main image in the story. The picture shows Theresa May in softer light as she is stance with a dark background which could suggest that she is trying to make Brexit happen and leave the bad behind her making it seem as though Brexit will be the light of the time and the best option for us as a country. Her facial positioning is facing away and is not giving direct eye contact which suggests that she is looking at Brussels and saying it to them rather than us as an audience. This is showing that she is a strong leader that will get things done directly herself rather than leaving it. The fact that her mouth is slightly open again suggests that she has a strong opinion and will speak for the country herself and looks as though she can be seen as a reliable leader. Her eyes are also shown as though they are not very wide which can connote that she is fierce and ready to argue about what she thinks is best as a country, supporting the right-winged views about Brexit.
-
In source B the main image then contrasts this again as Theresa May still is portrayed in a bad light. This can be seen through the way she is making direct eye contact as us as an audience. This can show that she is not addressing the situation with Brussels in a very strong way and shows she is lacking good leadership skills. This is because instead of sorting it in a calm way between two leaders as the right way it should be, she is getting everyone involved in the strong violence of the 'war' she has declared, which may be for the worst of the country. The way in which the photo is also a close up photo enhances the anger and sternness of her face showing that it isn't going too smoothly as it should have, this is again proving that the guardians views on Brexit are negative, as if Brexit was the right decision it would have gone a lot smoother and turned out better for Theresa May as a whole meaning she does not have to be so angry. The photo is not a very flattering photo and shows that she has been caught off guard suggesting that it is a true representation of her as a whole, which is in quite an evil way making it seem as though she is the antagonist of the whole situation.
-
In conclusion, Source A and B have very different attitudes and beliefs about the ideology of Brexit. In source A it shows that the Daily Mail have a very much right-wing view and are extremely set on Brexit. Whereas it is evident from Source B that they have a much more left-wing view and are leaning away from the idea of Brexit. This can be shown through the use of language used in both headlines and the pictures that both newspapers have chosen as the main image, showing the positive and negative views they both hold.

